Re: [xsd-users] no abstract base classes with "Customizing the generated type — the complex case"

[Oliver Schneider]

Hi Boris,

> Or do you want all "base" classes that result from type customization
> to be abstract? If so, I am not 100% sure: it doesn't have to be
> derived from. Someone, for example, could use it as a member.

Yes, that would be necessary.
Using an abstract type for a member is invalid xsd, isn't it?
so only derivation is actually interesting.

/Oliver