[xsd-users] no abstract base classes with "Customizing the generated type — the complex case"

[Boris Kolpackov]

Hi Oliver,

Oliver Schneider <xsd-users at oli-obk.de> writes:

> the _base classes still have a _clone function (declared and defined)
> What are the criteria that make sure they don't exist? 

The type should be defined as abstract in the schema (abstract="true").

Or do you want all "base" classes that result from type customization
to be abstract? If so, I am not 100% sure: it doesn't have to be
derived from. Someone, for example, could use it as a member.

Boris