[xsde-users] Re: ignoring parts of the schema - and referenced schemas

[Boris Kolpackov]

Hi Eric,

Eric Broadbent <eric.broadbent at csr.com> writes:

> And finally, to close the topic: removing validation allows the unexpected 
> attribute to pass without complaint.

Thank for sharing your findings. Just to explain why other methods that
you tried didn't work: Office schemas seems to use what I would call an
"out-of-schema extension". That is, it is an extension that is not
defined in the schemas that they provide and, as a result, their
documents cannot be validated against these schemas (because of these
extra attributes they will be considered invalid).

Boris