[xsd-users] Relating XSD identifiers to C++ identifiers

[Iain Sharp]

Yes, this is exactly what it is. The code and naming is correct (according to the defined behaviour of CS), but my point is that the description in doxygen says something different from what CS has actually done, especially in terms of how it relates to the original schema.

A more accurate description of the class would be:
"Class corresponding to the instance of an anonymous type of attribute announcedAttribute in schema type blahBlahBlah."

Regards

Iain


-----Original Message-----
From: Boris Kolpackov [mailto:boris at codesynthesis.com] 
Sent: 09 February 2018 13:26
To: Iain Sharp <isharp at atis.org>
Cc: xsd-users at codesynthesis.com
Subject: Re: [xsd-users] Relating XSD identifiers to C++ identifiers

Iain Sharp <isharp at atis.org> writes:

> One thing I do note in this context - some of the doxygen comments 
> generated by CS are rather misleading. For example, I have a class 
> called "announcedAttribute1", with the description "Class 
> corresponding to the announcedAttribute1 schema type.", but there is 
> no schema type "announcedAttribute1", this is a name assigned by CS to 
> a schema type called "announcedAttribute".

Are you sure it is not a name assigned to an anonymous type of attribute announcedAttribute that was clashing with real/another announcedAttribute?
If the answer is "no", then can you send a small test schema that reproduces the problem?

Boris