[xsd-users] Binary serialization performance in version 4.0.0 vs 3.3.0

[svetlana.samsonik at thomsonreuters.com]

Hi Boris,

Optimized results are completely satisfactory.
Thanks a lot for your help!

Svetlana

-----Original Message-----
From: Boris Kolpackov [mailto:boris at codesynthesis.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 6:50 AM
To: Samsonik, Svetlana (TR Technology)
Cc: xsd-users at codesynthesis.com
Subject: Re: [xsd-users] Binary serialization performance in version 4.0.0 vs 3.3.0

Hi Svetlana,

svetlana.samsonik at thomsonreuters.com <svetlana.samsonik at thomsonreuters.com> writes:

> I did not give you correct results and yes, there is no performance 
> difference between c++98 and c++11 optimized.
> 
>       --std c++98 -O0  --std c++98 -O2   --std c++11 -O0   --std c++11 -O2
>
> Pasre XDR:         725            234          1405              230

Ok, this makes much more sense now. While it is curious that the non- optimized C++11 build is twice as slow as non-optimized C++98, it is not entirely unexpected. Talking about performance of non-optimized code doesn't really make much sense; all kind of things can be going on there (e.g., assert's, debug checks, etc).


> Do you still want parse() function? My newsMessage object is deeply nested.

In my view this is resolved unless you for some reason expect better performance of the debug builds. If you are also satisfied with the result, then, no, I don't need the parse() functions.

Boris