[xsd-users] Re: Xsd information

[Boris Kolpackov]

Hi Anatolii,

In the future, please send technical questions regarding XSD usage to
the xsd-users mailing list (which I've also CC'ed to this reply) instead
of directly to me.

Anatolii.Belomestnov at ubs.com <Anatolii.Belomestnov at ubs.com> writes:

> Never mind this one, I was creating an auto_ptr in one of the called
> methods which I think was deleting some stuff before its time.

Ok, I am glad you found the cause and thanks for letting me know.


> See, the boost::shared_ptr would be great to use because you don't need
> to do all the accounting of who should own the objects. Auto-ptr still
> requires to be watched closely. And I would have more freedom with
> boost.

As I said in my previous post, nothing prevents you from re-assigning
the ownership from auto_ptr to shared_ptr after parsing. That's the
only place where will ever need to do it.


hth,
-boris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 652 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://codesynthesis.com/pipermail/xsd-users/attachments/20060609/d1de9db4/attachment.pgp