[libcutl-users] Re: Bug#975430: libcutl: FTBFS against boost_1.74

[Boris Kolpackov]

László Böszörményi (GCS) <gcs at debian.org> writes:

> This might be prevented by Boost include std/version (making the path
> more unique), libcutl to place standard C++ header include paths first
> or by renaming its version file to version.txt or something like that.
> I think the Boost solution would be the best, multiple projects might
> have a 'version' named file. It's not my call, I don't have contact
> with them. Meanwhile I can remove 'version' from libcutl as it seems
> it's unused.

Sounds good. In the next release of libcutl we will both remove the
dependency on Boost and get rid of the include search path that would
pick up just version (all the libcutl header will be included with the
library prefix).

And thanks for the detailed analysis.