[xsd-users] C++/Parser errors from GML schemas
James Boyden
jboyden at geosci.usyd.edu.au
Wed Oct 19 11:06:44 EDT 2005
On Monday, Oct 17, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
> I was test the in-development version of xsd against the GML schemas
> you sent me and found out that they are not quite valid. In this version,
> I decided to turn "expensive" (time and memory -wise) checks (such as
> unique particle attribution, etc.) on which uncovered the whole bunch
> of errors (see below). I checked one instance and turned out that the
> schema is indeed invalid. For example, here is the snippet from
> coordinateOperations.xsd:519:
>
> [...]
>
> There are two problems in this case:
>
> 1. OperationMethodBaseType should explicitly declare each element found
> in DefinitionType (name and description are missing).
>
> 2. We cannot add any new elements/attributes (methodName in this case)
> for valid OperationMethodBaseType content model should also be
> valid per DefinitionType.
Hi Boris,
Thank you very much for this information. We have passed it on to some of
the GML developers. I will provide an update when they have responded to
us about these problems.
Regards,
James Boyden
--
James Boyden <jboyden at geosci.usyd.edu.au>
GPlates Programmer and Keeper of the Flame,
School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, Australia.
"I find your lack of faith disturbing."
More information about the xsd-users
mailing list